America’s Hot Air
Dec 02
Why is this latest study so radically different? Are the varying results a symptom of increasingly dire air conditions or simply the variation of calculation methods? According to the researchers, it’s the latter. The U.S. EPA and EDGAR counted total emissions from the source, such as each cow and each unit of coal and natural gas sold in the nation, while the most recent study measured actual methane emissions in the air, the scientists said.
"The bottom-up and top-down approaches give us very different answers about the level of methane gas emissions," lead study author Scot Miller, a graduate student at Harvard, said in the statement. "Most strikingly, our results are higher by a factor of 2.7 over the south-central United States, which we know is a key region for fossil-fuel extraction and refining. It will be important to resolve that discrepancy in order to fully understand the impact of these industries on methane emissions."
The percentage of man-made methane production versus natural sources was 60-40, and a quarter of the total man-made emissions came from Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas—perhaps less of a surprise than the fact that humans were responsible for the overall majority.
Source: http://www.livescience.com/41528-methane-levels-us-higher.html